I just spent two and a half days in a conference, and it wasn’t unbearable. In fact, it was sustaining! How the heck did that happen?
Good subject, good speakers, good weather, good facility - all these are nice, but not that unusual nor sufficient to make such a long conference fulfilling. I think there were three key unique aspects to Rio+2.0:
My unconference discussions were on ewaste and economic development; water policy and ict; and, connecting Silicon Valley and the MENA (Middle East and North Asia). Kathrin Winkler of EMC Corp had nominated and led the first discussion, Tomas Anker Christensen of the Danish Embassy the second, and David Munir Nabti of AltCity.Me the third. Each had about 15 attendees, and in each we had a discussion that has the potential to enrich Rio+20.
I’ll leave Palo Alto with not only new thoughts, but about 20 follow-ups that I agreed to! Most involve ideas for further activities leading into Rio, and then beyond. And I am sure that anyone else who stayed through the full event has the same tale. As someone said, it really was idea sex!
Leave a Comment